The Action Peoples Party, (APP) has withdrawn its election petition against the President-elect, Sen. Bola Tinubu.
At the resumed hearing of the matter at the Presidential Election Petition Court on Wednesday in Abuja, counsel to APP, Mr Obed Agu, told the court that his client wished to withdraw the petition.
“I filed a motion on notice on behalf of my client on May 9 and we desire to move the motion.
“The petitioner/applicant wishes to withdraw the petition in line with Paragraph 29 Sub (1,2,3) of the Schedule of Election Petitions.
“The petitioner is asking for an order of court to grant it leave to withdraw the petition and an order of court striking out or dismissing the petition.”
Responding, counsel to Tinubu, Mr Wole Olanipekun, SAN, told the court that he had been served a copy of the application and was not opposed to it.
Olanipekun rather commended the party for withdrawing the petition and expressed optimism that more parties would withdraw their petitions against his client.
For his part, Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, told the court that he had filed an affidavit pursuant to Paragraph 30 of the first Schedule to the Electoral Act 2022.
Fagbemi said that in the affidavit, it was stated essentially that there was no collusion and that he was not opposing the application to withdraw the petition.
The deponent of the affidavit, Mr Omosanya Popoola, said he knew for a fact that the petitioners had indicated their intention to withdraw the petition by filing a motion to that effect on May 9.
He deposed that no agreement or term was reached by the APC with the petitioners in their decision to withdraw the petition.
“I know as a fact that no agreement or terms of any kind whatsoever was entered into with the petitioners and based on the above information, i sincerely believe that the petitioners were not influenced by anybody to withdraw this petition.”
Counsel to the Independent National Electoral Commission, (INEC), Mr Abubakar Mahmoud, SAN, also informed the court that he had been served a copy of the motion.
He also said there was no collusion and he commended the APP for withdrawing the petition.
He said that his client would not ask for cost.
In a short ruling, the presiding judge, Justice Haruna Tsammani said that the panel had carefully considered the application of the APP.
He said they were satisfied that there was no collusion on the part of the respondents.
“Petition No. CA/PEPC/02/2023 is hereby dismissed,” Tsammani said.